How to make money reading scientific papers

Do you want to get paid to write? If yes, this list of 30 websites and blogs that pay writers is exactly what you need. You can get paid to write about anything ; this list is comprehensive and provides a list scientfiic websites in over a dozen categories: web design, travel, writing, programming, business, tech, education, parenting, adult education, ceramics, health, wellness… you name it. The original list of websites that offer paid writing jobs was compiled almost a decade ago. Since then, the content policy of many of the websites originally listed has changed; some stopped paying writers, some changed their rates, and others stopped accepting contributed content altogether. This list has now been updated to reflect these changes. More than half of the publications from the original list have been removed. The list has been updated for and contains publications that Writers in Charge deading confirmed are actually paying writers for articles in It features both websites and blogs so, yes, you can get paid to blog!

News headlines

Writing is an incredibly powerful skill, one that can be used to make money in many different ways. For the academically-minded, the ability to get paid to write scientific articles is an appealing one. This type of content is a surprisingly good income approach and has some other advantages as well. As with writing medical articles , scientific writing tends to pay more. Some writers may even have advanced degrees. Additionally, some people simply find the approach fascinating. You do get to write about complex and interesting topics, often in more depth than other types of articles. Scientific writing is a general term.

Latest news

It can apply to writing for academic journals or creating reports based on research. This type of writing is typically heavily referenced and involves significant expertise. On the other hand, scientific writing can just refer to reporting on scientific events. That could be as simple as writing for a blog and analyzing various scientific studies that come out. There are also jobs that fall in the middle. For example, some scientific writers are responsible for doing initial literature summaries and early drafts for pieces that will eventually be published. Researchers and other writers then fill in the later pieces and make edits and tweaks along the way. At the same time, scientific writing covers many different fields of study. In many cases, writers will just focus on a single area, depending on the type of writing and their expertise. But, regardless of the specific approach or job, scientific writing does tend to be formal, researched and logical. The idea is to heavily rely on facts and data, backing up whatever you say.

More from News

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy , and our Terms of Service. Is there a way we can get money for our research paper? Do research journals pay us for a research paper? Or can we sell the research paper? Indirect as seteropere explains by improving your visibility and getting higher chance of being recruited in higher quality institute with higher payment. Direct: In many academic or even industrial institutes, researchers are being paid and are bound to perform research and publish paper in certain journals or conferences mostly journal. If they fail, either they will be fired or will be punished. In order to avoid such experience, many are hiddenly searching for an opportunity to buy a paper in high price.

1. Plan your set-up

Most open-access OA journals make money by making authors pay an article processing charge to publish a paper. A small online malaria journal based in the Netherlands wants to turn that situation on its head. The idea behind the move—possible thanks to a Dutch funding agency—is not only to lure authors to the journal, but also to drive home the message that academic publishing is way too expensive, says the journal’s editor, Bart Knols. The upstart journal—which has so far published only 57 papers—is part of MalariaWorld, a website and networking tool that has some registered users in countries. Knols says he hopes to attract more papers, but not to steal authors from Malaria Journal specifically. For African researchers especially—who, Knols says, are underrepresented in the literature and in academic debates—the reward may be an interesting incentive, he says.

Spread the word!

Don’t yet try to decide what the results mean ; just write down what they are. Log in Facebook Loading Can you come up with any alternative way of interpreting them? Article Edit. To form a truly educated opinion on a scientific monney, you need to become familiar with current research in that field. What exactly are the authors trying to answer with their research? US Edition U.

2. Start writing

Generally, scientific papers may be classified either as review papers or as empirical research papers. Both types ppers serve as excellent sources for a deeper understanding of a particular area of scientific research.

However, these papers are dense and include terminology that may be intimidating. If you have patience and approach the paper methodically, you’ll be able to understand the research presented and incorporate it into your own work.

Study Forest Plots Closely: In addition to the basic graph, forest plots include a wealth of other information, including the names of the authors of the studies reviewed, the year each reviewed study was conducted or published, and the number of patients in the treatment and control groups in each study.

Tip: If you don’t have much knowledge of the field, a comprehensive overview designed for a layperson will give you greater familiarity without weighing you down with terminology. Then you can return to the scientific paper with a greater understanding. Pay attention to the figures! Authors often don’t have enough space to discuss all data gathered in. The charts and graphs included in the paper often include information not discussed in the text of the paper, and may be more important than the text.

Tip: A search engine such as Google Scholar allows you to search specifically for citations to the paper mame read. Even if you can’t access the full paper, you’ll typically be able to see the context in which the article was cited. To read a scientific paper, start by skimming the title papeds section headings to get a feel for the structure of the paper.

Next, read the abstract and introduction for more information about the subject matter and the questions the author sought to answer in the paper. Then, skim for keywords and phrases, taking notes and underlining important terms as you go. Pay attention to raw data and any figures included and consider checking out the references to gain a better understanding of the context.

For more tips on reading actively, scroll down! This article was co-authored by our trained team of editors and researchers papees validated it for accuracy and comprehensiveness. Together, they cited information from 25 references. Categories: Science Technical Reading. Log in Facebook Loading Google Loading Civic Loading No account yet? Create an account.

Edit this Article. We use cookies to make wikiHow great. By using our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Article Edit. Learn readung people trust wikiHow. Learn more Reasing 1. Determine the paper is a review paper.

Review papers summarize the data and conclusions of many other papers to give you an overview of a specific topic or field. Typically, you’ll see the word «review» in either the title or the abstract of the paper. Review papers can also help you identify empirical papers you need to read or use as sources in your own work.

Identify whether the paper is a narrative review or a systematic review. A narrative review is typically easier to read and provides a broad overview of a particular field of scholarship or area of research.

Systematic reviews are more detailed and may evaluate the methods and data of the papers reviewed. Systematic reviews are most common with medical studies. Read through the abstract and introduction of the paper.

The abstract is a summary of the review paper, including the question asked and the answer found by the authors of the paper. The introduction explains the reason the authors chose to undertake the review. Assess the design of the review critically. A systematic review combines the results from several sclentific studies to scientifiv a more comprehensive understanding of the area of research. However, this is only effective if the review includes both published and unpublished studies that used the same methodology.

A review that only includes published studies does not present the full xcientific of the state of research in that area. Some review papers may consider studies of different types, particularly in an emerging area of research where there haven’t been a lot of studies completed. Jump to the results section of the paper. Reading the results section first lets you know what to look for as you read through the rest of the paper. Once you know what the authors concluded, you can focus on the data in the studies reviewed that support that conclusion.

It also typically includes a summary of the number of studies of any given type that were reviewed by the authors. Analyze the methodology of the review carefully. For a review paper, the methodology section will discuss how studies were selected for inclusion in the review.

This includes the criteria used by the authors of the review and the data sources they searched for studies to include. Think about whether these criteria introduced any bias into the review.

Methodology also includes a description of how the results of the studies reviewed were synthesized by the authors of the review. Through synthesis, the review comes to a new typically broader conclusion than any of the individual studies reviewed. Study reaeing graphs that present the synthesized data.

A systematic review paper makes use of graphs known as «forest plots» to evaluate all the results from all the studies included in the review. Once you know how to interpret them, you may find forest plots easier to read papera other statistical graphs.

The vertical axis represents no effect. To the left of this axis, studies concluding treatment was effective will be plotted according to how extreme their results. On the right of the axis, studies are plotted that favored the control, rather than the treatment or intervention. With most reviews, you should be able to tell at a glance whether the majority of the studies favored the treatment or intervention.

Go back through the paper from beginning to end. Now that you have a strong understanding of the review and its methodology, you’ll be better able to make sense of the rest of the paper. Read actively, taking notes as you go. Make notes of individual empirical papers included in the review that you might want to read on your.

You can look it up online later, or check a scientific dictionary. Taking notes as you read can help you paraphrase information from the paper in your own writing later, without worrying that you’re plagiarizing the original source. Method 2. Glance over the title and section headings. The title and section headings of the paper give you a basic understanding how to make money reading scientific papers what the paper is. They also help you get a feel for the structure of the paper and how it’s organized.

It may take more of your time to read through. The title and the section headings also give you an idea of whether the paper is relevant to your interests and how difficult it will be to comprehend.

If the title and section headings include terminology you don’t understand, you may want to do some background reading and then come back to it. Read the abstract to determine whether the paper will be useful for you. The abstract is a summary of the paper as a. It will tell you what questions the authors sought to answer, the experiments they conducted, and the answers they.

For example, you may find an article published in a journal you can’t read without a subscription. The abstract will let you determine whether the full article is something you should read. If after fo the abstract, it doesn’t seem like the paper would be beneficial for you to read, there’s no need to read any. Continue with the introduction if the paper seems relevant. The introduction places the paper in context. It will let you know what is already known about the general topic, and how this paper fits in with the broader line of scholarship.

If the paper falls into a field of study that you’re not familiar with, the introduction may point you towards resources you can use to gain enough information to properly understand the paper. Review articles about the topic as necessary. If scientificc not familiar with the topic of the paper or the questions the rewding are trying to answer, you may need to do a little background reading before you’ll be able to understand the paper.

You may also want to use scientific dictionaries or other reference books to get rezding better understanding of words and phrases you aren’t familiar. Look at the paper’s conclusions.

Reading the conclusion before you dig into the meat of the experiments gives you a better ability to analyze the data and evaluate the data in context. Skip forward to the end of the paper and read the conclusion section that summarizes the authors’ findings.

If you don’t understand the conclusion, you may want to do additional background reading before digging into the data. Study the materials and methods sections carefully. Assuming you’ve gotten this far and have decided that you need to read the paper, move forward to the paper’s methodology section. If the authors used a method you’re not familiar with, you may want to do a little background research on that method before continuing.

Look for potential holes or biases in the authors’ method.

How to Read a Paper Efficiently (By Prof. Pete Carr)

How to become a science blogger — your how to make money reading scientific papers guide We show you the four steps to get blogging — but don’t be fooled: starting a science blog or website is NOT a trivial task. Setting up and maintaining a website and creating content on a more or less regular basis takes effort and commitment, Also don’t underestimate the patience and time required to grow your readership, get feedback, and get traction on social media. And then there is the issue of «Why? Share your research with the world? Build a profile and get your name out there? At its heart, blogging is about sharing your knowledge with the world. It all boils down to this: Do you have a genuine interest in passion for writing about whatever topic it is? Do I really want to do this? Are you a scientist wanting to share your work with the world? Find a community? Or a budding science writer keen to build a profile and get your name out there?