Nita Lowey, D-N. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga. Lowey said changes made to a border aid package adopted Wednesday by House were aimed at getting the money to the border agencies as quickly as possible but making sure preventjng the safety and proper care of migrants and children was not bils. Billions of dollars for resource-constrained border agencies that are rapidly running out of cash due to an unprecedented surge of migrants is in jeopardy as the congressional clock counts down to the July Fourth recess. A senior administration official said President Donald Trump would veto the revised package unveiled by House Democrats early Thursday and reiterated support for the Senate version, which passed on Wednesday. The House Rules Committee early Thursday, on an vote, adopted parameters for floor debate on the House amendments to the Senate bill Swhich passed in that chamber as an amendment to an earlier House version of the House bill HR The amendment calls for about 10 significant changes to the Senate bill, which include tightening of language on the standards of care for migrant children in government custody and adjustments in funding from the Senate bill, including additions, and some reductions. House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita M. LoweyD-N. After the House passes it, the Senate should take it up and send it to the President for his signature. Tom ColeR-Okla.
Site Index
Lawmakers and local advocates called on Congress to enact gun control legislation and encouraged citizens to vote for politicians who would support those measures. In the months leading up to the mid-term elections, journalists noticed something surprising. Some Democrats were running unabashedly on gun control, a topic once thought too controversial for political candidates to take on. While there was plenty of firearms violence in America in December of — Americans were injured, and lost their lives, according to the Gun Violence Archive —there wasn’t a single incident on the scale of Sandy Hook. That the th Congress introduced so many gun bills anyway shows that lawmakers were developing a sustained interest in the issue. Now that Congress has been at work for seven months, has that interest helped any of those bills make progress? In the wake of a week of racist, terroristic mass shootings, I decided to check on the status of all 33 new firearms bills introduced in January of , using the non-profit GovTrack. I found that there hasn’t been a lot of movement on these pieces of legislation, but still far more than in the past. Two bills have taken steps forward. There’s the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act , which makes it easier for states to use money, derived from taxes on firearms and ammunition, to expand or create new shooting ranges on public land.
Is this page useful?
President Donald Trump signed that legislation into law in May. Then there’s the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of , which shores up the existing federal background check law by closing loopholes. Studies show that states with several gun control policies working together, including a stronger background check law, seem to have fewer gun crimes involving illegal firearms. The federal background check law alone has not done well in studies. Researchers attribute this to the fact that it has so many exceptions. Finally, there are a few bills in Congress now that would give money to states to enact extreme risk protection order laws, which are sometimes called «red-flag» laws. Extreme risk protection orders are fairly new, so the evidence for them is still only suggestive. They might be especially effective in preventing suicides, the top reason for firearm deaths. Homicide is No.
The amendment calls for about 10 significant changes to the Senate bill, including adjustments in funding from the Senate bill
Days after California enacted a law allowing college athletes to sign endorsement deals, lawmakers in other states and in Congress threaten legislation to advance player compensation. The country’s largest state has thrown its legislative weight behind letting college athletes profit from their status — and now more than a dozen states and Congress may follow California’s lead. The spreading movement adds to the mounting pressure on the National Collegiate Athletic Association to improve its treatment of big-time college athletes. Gonzalez, a former Ohio State University football player, told ESPN that he would want to work on a quicker timeline than the California law, which takes effect in The California law, Senate Bill , nicknamed Fair Pay to Play, prevents the NCAA from disqualifying collegiate players if they have third-party contracts with vendors that pay them for marketing campaigns, sponsorships and other uses of their name and image. It does not allow college athletes to be paid by their university, which was a strategic move by California legislators to propel the bill further, said Callan Stein, a partner at the law firm Pepper Hamilton who works in white-collar legislation and follows NCAA issues in the courts. Several state legislators — including in Florida, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania and South Carolina — have announced they plan to introduce legislation similar to the California bill, and Kevin Parker, a state senator from New York, introduced a bill in September that is currently in committee. While momentum for additional compensation for college players appears to be building, don’t overestimate it; the NCAA and the college sports establishment have withstood such pressures before. And efforts to allow athletes to unionize gained traction with the National Labor Relations Board before hitting a wall.
Details of amendment
Violence in the workplace is an unfortunately common experience for many health care workers, and until now, there was no law protecting their safety. Now, a passed House bill might change that. Health care workers are often attacked—verbally and physically—by their own patients, and until recently, not much has been said or done about it. A newly passed bill by Congress is proposing mandatory violence reporting to better protect workers. New data from the U. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows there has been a 70 percent increase in intentional injuries to registered nurses by patients around the country between to A GAO study even reported that rats of violence against health care workers are up to 12 times higher than rates for the overall workforce.
Is this page useful? Congress could not carry them out reasonably or responsibly without knowing what the executive is doing; how programs are being administered, by whom, and at what cost; and whether officials are obeying the law and complying with legislative intent. To help us improve GOV. Courts must take into account whether an individual followed approved guidance notes when making decisions in relation to suspected money laundering. Capitol Hill. HM Treasury also issues Advisory Notices regarding the risks posed by unsatisfactory money laundering and terrorist financing controls in a number of jurisdictions. Thank you for your feedback. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. The Financial Action Task Force FATF is the leading inter-governmental body that sets global standards on tackling money laundering and terrorist finance. We use this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve government services.
Can Congress Pass a Law Disarming People in Crisis?
Although the U. By comparison to these select panel investigations, other congressional inquiries in recent Congresses—into the Whitewater controversyaccess to Federal Bureau of Sae files, White House Travel Office firings, and campaign financing—have relied upon standing committees. HM Treasury also issues Advisory Notices regarding the risks posed by unsatisfactory money laundering and terrorist financing controls in a number of jurisdictions. The Money Laundering Regulations require firms to put policies and procedures in place in order to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. Congress can use its appropriations power to restrict the agency’s funding. And while Congress wants miles of mmoney, it was appropriating only enough money to complete about miles of it, Congressional bi,ls acknowledged, leaving it unclear as to whether the entire structure will be built. Oversight, as an outgrowth of this principle, ideally serves a number of overlapping objectives and purposes:.
Scott Horsley. The law would allow waitstaff tips to be shared with cooks and other back-of-the-house restaurant workers but prevents owners from getting a cut. It also allocates some smaller amounts: the money customers leave behind as tips in restaurants, nail salons and other businesses.
A Deadly Weekend in America Renews Attention to Congress’ Languishing Gun-Control Bills
The legislation makes it clear that tips belong to the workers who receive them and can’t be taken by their employers, managers or supervisors. Patty Murray, D-Wash. The long-standing policy that tips belong to workers had been called into question by a proposed rule from the Trump administration’s Labor Department. The rule was intended to encourage more sharing of tips with cooks and dishwashers. But critics said it would have allowed business owners to pocket the money themselves. When the Labor Department asked for public comment on the proposal, more thanpeople responded. Many restaurant servers are already required to share a portion of their tips with hostesses and busboys. But restaurant owners have not been allowed to require such tip pooling with «back of the house» workers.
Comments
Post a Comment